Kwasi Kwarteng, a member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has publicly criticised renowned media personality Nana Aba Anamoah over her recent comments defending President John Dramani Mahama’s utilisation of a private jet belonging to his brother, Ibrahim Mahama. The controversy erupted after Nana Aba argued that it was practical and reasonable for the president to make use of his relative’s luxury asset, drawing a parallel to borrowing a brother’s Rolls-Royce if one were available. Her remarks were intended to support the president’s choice amidst ongoing public discourse regarding the use of private aircraft by public officials.

However, Kwarteng swiftly dismissed her reasoning in a reaction shared on social media, accusing her of shifting her stance based on political convenience. He mocked the analogy, suggesting that if her logic were to be accepted, it could justify the president operating out of his brother’s office, relying on private security, or even circumventing state resources entirely. Kwarteng argued that such a perspective raises serious concerns about consistency, warning that future leaders might be compelled to depend solely on whatever assets their relatives possess, thereby blurring the lines between private privilege and public duty.

In his concluding remarks, Kwarteng described Nana Aba as opportunistic, asserting that her views appear to change with the tide of political power. He implied that her support for Mahama in this instance was a departure from principles she may have upheld under previous administrations, cynically noting that she only aligns herself “where the food is.” The exchange has since ignited further debate on social media about the role of public figures in political discourse and the standards to which leaders should be held regarding the use of state versus private resources.

In the heated landscape of political primaries, Kennedy Ohene Agyapong’s recent statement strikes a crucial chord: “This is a contest, not a war.” As the New Patriotic Party (NPP) approaches its internal elections, his reminder serves as a necessary call for perspective. All too often, the fierce competition for leadership fractures parties into hostile camps, with personal ambitions overshadowing collective goals. Agyapong’s words wisely frame the primary as a democratic exercise—a temporary clash of ideas and visions—rather than an irreversible schism. It is an appeal to keep the contest within the bounds of respect and shared purpose, ensuring that the energy spent on internal debates strengthens rather than weakens the party’s foundation.

Ultimately, the most important part of his message lies in the forward-looking pledge: “After Saturday, we are not factions; we are one party.” This sentiment is the bedrock of any successful political movement. Regardless of Saturday’s outcome, the true test for the NPP will be its ability to unify behind the chosen flagbearer and direct its focus toward the broader national contest. Agyapong’s call is not just for civility during the vote, but for genuine reconciliation afterward. It underscores that internal primaries are a means to an end—a process to select a standard-bearer, not an excuse for lasting division. For supporters and delegates, it is a powerful reminder that the ultimate goal lies beyond the primary, in presenting a united front capable of governing.

This is the time to appreciate and reward our loyal Kennedy Ohene Agyapong who have consistently defended the party and held the grassroots firm.
The NPP was formed to win political power and to sustain it. We cannot gamble our future with a candidate who has already shown signs of letting the party down.
A vote for Kennedy Ohene Agyapong is a vote for victory, party unity, and job creation.
He remains our strongest hope and the most reliable option as we prepare for the 2028 general elections.
The NPP was not formed for cowards. Our forefathers stood boldly and fought hard to bring us this far. Today, the party is not safe, and history must guide our decisions.
In 1992, late Prof. Albert Adu Boahen won the party about 1.2 million votes. We appreciated his efforts, but it was clear he could not win us power. The party made a bold decision and brought in J.A. Kufuor.
Though Kufuor lost the 2000 elections, he increased our votes from 1.2 million to 3.1 million. That growth showed promise. The party believed in him again, and in 2004, he won with 4.5 million votes.
That is the true mark of a good flagbearer—one who consistently adds value to the party’s votes.
Former President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo left us with 6.7 million votes in the 2020 elections. Unfortunately, under Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, our votes dropped drastically to about 4 million.
This is a clear signal that he cannot win power for the party.
Kennedy Ohene Agyapong is ready—and Ghanaians are ready—to bring the NPP back to power.
Do not give up on 31st January.
A Kennedy Ohene Agyapong presidency is communal labour—everyone matters, everyone contributes, and everyone benefits.

*Hon. Ebenezer Acquah*

Director of Communication for Ken, Gomoa Central Constituency

Central Regional Communication Team Member for Ken